RFRA and Church of Cannabis: Partake or bust?


-031_levin.JPG_20150520.jpg

 

J&C readers 12:14 p.m. EDT May 22, 2015

Question: Bill Levin, an Indianapolis resident, said he plans to hold the first services of his newly created, marijuana-devoted First Church of Cannabis on July 1, the day Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act goes into effect, to test the new law. How should police and the state handle the situation?

• They should ignore it. The war on (some) drugs has been an unqualified failure, needlessly destroying countless lives and trashing the precepts of our Constitution. Considering that the original federal RFRA was passed to protect the religious use of peyote, I think this is a perfect response.

Rob Keeney

Flora

• Arrest him, and let him try his defense. I assume that’s what he’s expecting. Surely he’s not as stupid as the people who attacked RFRA as if it gave carte blanche.

Roger Bennett

Lafayette

• This is why we have the Establishment Clause: the minute you start getting the government mucking around with religion — as RFRA does — you get into all sorts of nasty corners, like this one. The law is pretty clear the state cannot interfere with their religious behavior, so this this is an example of "hoist on one’s own petard" in action.

Brian Capouch

Monon

• Presumably he will be supported by all Christians who supported the law in the first place. The police should go investigate real crimes. Be careful what you wish for, Christians, you might get it.

Mark D. Rumps

Lafayette

• I don’t think drug use is covered under the law. I say bust him.

Mark Acles

Lafayette

• Well, they wanted to protect "religious freedom" with this law, didn’t they? Since when should the government determine what qualifies as a religion? This is what happens when we try to mix church and state.

Noemi Ybarra

Lafayette

• Abe Lincoln asked, "If you call a dog’s tail a leg, how many legs would it have?" His answer: "Four. Calling the tail a leg doesn’t make it a leg." Calling a criminal enterprise a church does not make it a church and should be punished as a crime.

Tom Haynie

Buffalo

• If you think this case is a problem, be glad they amended this monstrosity, or Indiana would be headed toward daily media humiliation. This case is directly similar to the one that started the federal RFRA.

Randy Studt

Lafayette

• I thought the new law was to protect the religious rights of all people? How about the Flat Earth Society? I have it from good authority that in the Star Trek Universe, there is a Flat Universe Society.

Furman A. Powell

Lafayette

• The media created the controversy by exaggerating RFRA to make Gov. Mike Pence look bad. They got their wish. Liberals tend to be the master of unintended consequences, so most rational Indiana residents already expected this type of action. Expect more legislation, more unintended consequences, more wasted tax dollars.

Dan Sommers

West Lafayette

• Join them. Sarcastically, it’s pretty much like I said when you asked a very similar question last December before the state legislature convened: "You’ll see recreation marijuana legalized long before selling ‘to go’ alcohol on a Sunday."

John Kuntz

Fowler

• Any law enforcement or state officials that show up should "take communion" just like everyone else attending the service.

Bryce Culverhouse

Lafayette

• Close the church down, it is illegal in the state of Indiana.

Carolyn Foust

Lafayette

• Shut him down and treat him to a period of time in jail. He is trying an illegal scam, and it will not work.

Harold Williams

Shadeland

• The exact opposite of how they probably will handle it. Honest to goodness.

Mike Dudgeon

Lafayette

• I think it is obvious — if it fits the law, then leave them alone.

Pat Rund

Romney

• This is what no one needs. This is Indiana, for goodness sake. Obviously, one of the more conservative states and this sort of weirdness only makes the underlying message more difficult to get out and for the public and for businesses to take seriously.

Bill Cochran

Lafayette

• If he is following the RFRA, and if the act is to allow religious freedom, what can they do? There is nothing in the law to prevent this church from practicing the rites of its religion.

Mary Finnegan

Lafayette

• Let Bill worship his idol, pot. But, should Bill or any of his followers hurt someone when "all hopped up on dope," the penalty is clear. Bill claims no faith in religion; me, either. My faith is in Jesus, who said, "No one comes to the father but through me."

Jon Held

Lafayette

• Lock them up and throw away the key.

Jack Lahrman

Sheffield Township

• The police and the state should attend the church of their choice.

David B. Dobbin

West Lafayette

• Why should the police or the state get involved unless their newfound religion is infringing on someone’s rights? The less we have Big Brother controlling our thoughts and actions, the more liberty and freedom citizens can preserve.

Edward Priest

Battle Ground

• Under the law for Indiana and marijuana, this would be a criminal act. Indiana police and the state should treat this fairly, as any one who breaks the law. I would hope the dealer’s arrested and faces Indiana courts, as anyone who commits a criminal act.

Shelby Branstetter

Lafayette

CONTINUE READING…

Advertisements